Netflix’s latest original feature, starring Thor himself, Chris Hemsworth, alongside Bollywood sensation Randeep Hooda, is about as high-octane a thriller as any action fan could hope for. Through all the captivating action sequences and frenetic fight scenes, Extraction actually manages to tell a pretty complex story with an ambiguous ending that has fans abuzz with theories.
Extraction follows protagonist Tyler Rake, a former member of the Australian Special Air Service Regiment now working as an off-the-books mercenary. At the film’s outset, he’s engaged by fellow killer-for-hire Nik Khan to rescue the son of India’s leading drug kingpin, who is currently being held for an exorbitant ransom by rival Bangladeshi drug lord Amir Asif.
A hiccup during Rake’s attempted “extraction” of his target brings down the wrath of Saju, another former special operative currently in the employ of the Bangladeshi drug lord. Rake and Saju engage in a complex game of cat and mouse…
But they ultimately end up working together to outwit the authorities on their tails.
As far as action-thriller set-ups go, it’s about as compelling as they come, but viewers hoping for a clear-cut resolution that sees charismatic anti-hero Rake victoriously walking away from an explosion in slow motion were left with a real head scratcher. Let’s break Extraction’s ambiguous ending down with a little help from the film’s director, Sam Hargrave.
At the beginning of the film, shark-eyed mercenary Tyler Rake has an obvious death wish. His ambivalence toward his own continued survival is a big part of what makes him such a deadly merc. We learn that much of Rake’s nihilism stems from the death of his son, a loss that still haunts him.
It’s his relationship with Ovi, his target for extraction, that ultimately saves Rake from himself. As Rake begins to form a bond with Ovi, he no longer sees the drug heir as a simple job, but rather a kid whose life has become more important than his own.
By the time the film reaches its climactic shootout on the bridge, Rake takes a mortal wound to ensure Ovi’s safe escape. This emotional beat lands because we actually believe that Rake no longer wants to die, but has chosen to give up his life to save Ovi’s. So Rake gets to go to his grave feeling like he redeemed his soul, while Ovi lives to fight another day. Satisfying ending, right?
Not so fast.
After Ovi’s daring escape, the film presents a very unexpected coda. In the final moments of Extraction, Ovi jumps into a peaceful swimming pool, a mirror image of Rake’s first scene jumping off a cliff. When he comes up for air, he sees a blurry figure standing in the background who bears a striking resemblance to Rake, but the film ends before we get any actual confirmation. So, what gives?
As it turns out, Extraction’s final moments were left open to interpretation by design. Hargrave weighed in on the mystery surrounding this final scene. He told Collider:
“We had a version of the movie, and we tested it a lot, and it was not surprising that a lot of people wanted the character to live, and some people wanted him to die…If people on one hand feel like the story is complete and is a story of redemption through sacrifice, then for them, it’ll be where the kid is imagining [Rake standing there], and then now you go, ‘Yes, I’m satisfied.'”
Hargrave went on to explain, quote, “If you feel like you love Tyler Rake, and you love Chris Hemsworth, and you want a sequel, and you’re like ‘There’s no way, you can’t kill him!’ then that’s Tyler Rake standing there looking at you. So we kind of purposefully did not pull focus to the character standing there.”
For fans looking for a little more closure, Hargrave shared that the original screenplay for Extraction included a much more definitive ending. In screenwriter Joe Russo’s intended story, Tyler Rake very explicitly dies on the bridge, completing the character arc he started when he dove off that cliff in the initial scene. Hargrave told Collider that the test audiences weren’t crazy about the sacrifice, however.
“People were torn; it was almost down the middle. We want to appeal to as many people as possible without compromising the integrity of the story. And so, we think a pretty good compromise is to make an ambiguous ending.”
Hargrave ultimately admitted that he prefers to imagine that Rake is dead by the film’s conclusion, claiming that he felt as though Rake had redeemed himself through sacrifice. For fans in desperate need of finality, that’s probably the best you’re going to get. The rest of us will have to learn to live with the ambiguity, at least until we get an Extraction 2. Watch the video to have Extraction’s Ending Flawlessly Explained!
Read full article:
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://nonnaofitaly.com/tin-hot/
He probably survived, the lifeguard at the pool is Australian (yellow and red)
Weird coincidence that the kid end up in australia instead staying in India
Lvde ka extraction
Who says Chris Hemsworth can't perform a gun fight scene!!!!!
As clearly seen in initial parts of film, Saju works for Ovi's father, the indian drug mafia, who doesn't have enough money to pay for the extraction, as he is in jail.
So Saju plans to steal Ovi from Rake, after the extraction.
Man.. I never thought Netflix would make such a good movie like this. This movie is just WOW for me!
Just for the information – Bangladesh does not look like this at all…..they didn't even came in bangladesh for the schedule problem…..
I watched the movie yesterday and it’s just so sad when Tyler got killed 💔
After getting ovi instead of stupidity fighting to cross the bridge if he had worked smartly and took shelter in Indian embassy no body would have died
So is Tyler Rake still alive bois or what?
This movie was dope shout out my girl
Modern warfare 2019 campaign vibes
Very good Actionfilm….👍👍👍👍
Thank God, there's no slow motion in this movie. I saw it the way the action movie is.
Rake is 1500 years old I'm pretty sure he can survive anything at this point…
I wanted him to live, but what I took away was that He died. What the boy was seeing at the end was similar to what Tyler was seeing throughout the whole movie of his son, the out of focus memories etc…. just my opinion tho
Man on Fire.
I honestly loved this movie, and I was really expecting to be underwhelmed
Awesome action scenes
Awesome camera captures
Just loved it
That little shit can't kill the star. That's not possible 😎😎😎😎
For a franchise, Rake has to live…
Not the Thor we deserved, but the Thor we needed
Second best movie I've ever seen.
I didn't think he made it alive. It's very rare surviving a sniper shot.
Hope there's a sequel
Randeep is a B class bollywood actor
Each sequel should use a different Hemsworth.
Saju was not employed by Bangladesh drug lord. He double-crossed rake's team just because he didn't have enough money to pay for the extraction since his boss's assets are frozen by police.He clearly mentioned to his wife that he won't be able to afford rake's fee. He wanted them to do the hard work of getting the kid out and planned to steal him from rake so that he won't need to pay.
So much for a flawless explanation by looper.😆
I love this actor he should be Thor!!!